338(h)(10) vs. 336(e) Election:The Tax Tools That Break Deal Impasses

Both elections give a stock deal asset-purchase tax treatment. The difference is who is allowed to buy: 338(h)(10) requires a corporate purchaser, 336(e) does not. Here is how each works, and which one an individual or SBA-financed buyer needs.

By Alex Lubyansky, Esq.June 2026Updated August 202613 min read

Buyers want asset deals for the tax step-up. Sellers want stock deals for capital gains treatment. These preferences are directly opposed, and they kill deals that should close. The Section 338(h)(10) election is the mechanism that often breaks this impasse - giving the buyer the tax benefit they want while preserving the stock-purchase mechanics that simplify the seller's exit.

The election is not free for the seller. It generates incremental tax cost that must be compensated for in the deal structure. The buyer's stepped-up basis creates future tax savings; those savings are large enough that the buyer can fund the seller's incremental tax cost and still come out ahead. That economic logic is why the election is common in S-corp acquisitions and why understanding it is essential for any M&A practitioner advising on deal structure.

There is one condition that quietly disqualifies a large share of small business buyers from 338(h)(10) entirely: the purchaser has to be a corporation. Individuals, holding LLCs taxed as partnerships, and many SBA-financed acquisition entities do not qualify. Section 336(e) is the companion election that fills that gap, and it matters most in the sub-$10M deals where a first-time buyer is acquiring an S-corp with an SBA 7(a) loan.

Negotiating deal structure for an S-corp acquisition? The 338(h)(10) election decision should happen at the LOI stage, not at the purchase agreement. Request a consultation →

How the Economic Math Works

Illustrative Example: $10M S-Corp Acquisition

Pure Stock Sale (No Election)

Buyer's basis in Target$10M (cost)
Existing asset basis inside Target$2M (low)
Buyer's future depreciationLimited (low basis)
Seller's taxCapital gains only

Asset Purchase

Buyer's asset basis$10M (stepped up)
Buyer's future depreciationHigh (full basis)
Contract assignmentRequired for each
Seller's taxOrdinary on recapture

338(h)(10) Election

Buyer's asset basis$10M (stepped up)
Contract assignmentNot required
Seller's incremental tax~$X (negotiated gross-up)
Net to buyerAsset tax benefit - gross-up

Illustrative only. Actual tax impact depends on asset composition, seller tax basis, and applicable tax rates. Consult tax counsel.

Modeling the 338(h)(10) election economics for your deal? The gross-up negotiation requires both M&A counsel and tax advisors working together. Request a consultation →

When the Election Is Available and When It Is Not

338(h)(10) IS available for:

  • S-corporation stock acquisitions (most common use)
  • Acquisitions of subsidiaries in a consolidated group (parent selling a subsidiary)
  • Qualified stock purchases (acquirer purchases 80%+ of target stock in a 12-month period)

338(h)(10) is NOT available for:

  • Standalone C-corporation stock purchases (Section 338(g) available but different mechanics)
  • Partnership or LLC target acquisitions (Section 754 election may achieve similar result)
  • Non-corporate purchasers - individuals, and LLCs not taxed as corporations, cannot join a 338(h)(10) election even when the target qualifies (see 336(e) below)
  • Transactions that are not "qualified stock purchases" under the IRC

Acquiring an S-corp and need 338(h)(10) analysis? Submit your transaction details for an assessment of the election's impact on deal value. Request a consultation →

The 336(e) Election: When 338(h)(10) Doesn't Work

Section 336(e) does the same core job as 338(h)(10) - it lets the parties treat a qualifying stock disposition as if the target sold its assets, giving the buyer a stepped-up basis - but it removes the requirement that the buyer be a corporation. Under the 336(e) regulations, the election can apply to a sale, exchange, or distribution of at least 80% of the stock (by vote and value) of a domestic S-corporation, or of a domestic corporation that is a member of a selling consolidated or affiliated group, within a 12-month period. Generally, the buyer can be an individual, a partnership, an LLC taxed as a partnership or disregarded entity, or a corporation. It does not matter, because the election does not depend on the buyer's tax status at all.

That last point is the practical difference that matters most for deal structuring: a 336(e) election is made unilaterally by the seller. Generally, the S-corp and all of its selling shareholders (or the common parent of a selling consolidated group) execute a binding written agreement and attach the election statement to a timely filed return. The purchaser is not a party to the election and, as a matter of tax mechanics, does not need to consent to it. Economically, the buyer still needs to be involved, because the seller's incremental tax cost typically has to be negotiated into the purchase price, but the legal mechanism itself does not require the buyer's signature the way 338(h)(10)'s joint election does.

Section 336(e) also extends to certain distribution transactions, such as a corporate parent distributing an 80%-owned subsidiary's stock rather than selling it outright. That scenario is uncommon in small business acquisitions and comes up more often in corporate spin-offs, but it is part of why the election is drafted more broadly than 338(h)(10).

336(e) generally works when:

  • The target is a domestic S-corporation, or a domestic corporate subsidiary in a selling consolidated/affiliated group
  • 80%+ of the target's stock (vote and value) is sold, exchanged, or distributed within a 12-month period
  • The buyer is an individual, a partnership, an LLC not taxed as a corporation, or a corporation
  • The seller is willing to elect unilaterally and absorb the deemed-sale tax exposure, typically in exchange for a gross-up

336(e) is not a fit when:

  • The buyer is a corporation and the target is an S-corp - 338(h)(10) is generally the more established, better-understood tool for that scenario
  • The disposition falls short of the 80% vote-and-value threshold
  • The target is a partnership or LLC, since there is no stock to dispose of - other mechanisms, like a Section 754 election, apply instead
  • The seller has not modeled the incremental tax cost and is not prepared to negotiate a gross-up

This is a general summary of well-established mechanics, not a substitute for tax advice. Eligibility depends on the specific ownership structure, entity history, and disposition facts. Consult your tax advisor before relying on either election.

338(h)(10) vs. 336(e) vs. Straight Asset Purchase

Dimension 338(h)(10) Election 336(e) Election Straight Asset Purchase
Who can be the buyerCorporation only ("purchasing corporation")Individual, partnership, LLC, or corporationAny buyer type
Consent required fromBoth buyer and seller (joint election)Seller only (unilateral election)N/A - it is the underlying transaction, not an election
Legal transfer mechanicsStock purchase - contracts, permits, licenses generally do not need individual assignmentStock purchase - same transfer simplicity as 338(h)(10)Each asset, contract, and permit generally must be assigned individually
Tax outcome for buyerStepped-up basis in target's assetsStepped-up basis in target's assetsStepped-up basis in the assets purchased
Tax outcome for sellerDeemed asset sale - generally more tax than a pure stock sale, often offset by a negotiated gross-upDeemed asset sale - generally comparable incremental tax exposure to 338(h)(10), also typically offset by a gross-upOrdinary income exposure on recapture, often the least favorable outcome for the seller

Directional comparison only. Actual tax treatment depends on the target's asset composition, entity history, and each party's basis. Consult your tax advisor before choosing a structure.

"Sellers want stock for the capital gains treatment. Buyers want asset to limit contingent liability. Most attorneys treat that as a binary fight. I don't. Every deal is different... If you can pull the mechanics, motivations, and desires out on the front end, there's often a structure that gives both parties an outcome they can live with. The diametrically opposed framing falls apart when you ask better questions."

Alex Lubyansky, Esq., Acquisition Stars

Why This Matters More Below $10M

Step-up basis is not just a large-deal tax planning tool. In a sub-$10M acquisition, it directly affects the buyer's cash flow in the years that matter most: the years the buyer is servicing acquisition debt. A stepped-up basis in equipment, goodwill, and other amortizable intangibles generates real depreciation and amortization deductions against operating income, which lowers the buyer's tax bill during the exact period when free cash flow is tightest and being used to pay down debt. On a low-basis target bought as a straight stock purchase with no election, the buyer inherits the seller's old, often fully or largely depreciated basis, and gets little or no depreciation shelter for years.

This is precisely where the individual-buyer gap in 338(h)(10) becomes a real problem rather than a technicality. Most SBA 7(a)-financed acquisitions of an S-corp are structured as a stock purchase by an individual or a newly formed holding entity, not by an existing operating corporation. Under 338(h)(10) alone, that buyer would be locked out of the step-up entirely and would have to choose between an asset purchase, with its heavier contract-assignment burden, or a plain stock purchase with no tax benefit. Section 336(e) is what allows that same buyer to negotiate for asset-sale tax treatment on a stock deal, provided the seller is willing to make the unilateral election and the economics of a gross-up work for both sides. Confirm early with your SBA loan attorney and tax advisor whether your specific acquisition structure and lender requirements are compatible with a 336(e) election, and build the election decision into your purchase agreement drafting from the start rather than adding it after terms are set.

Structuring a Stock Purchase and Need the Tax Election Analyzed?

Tell us about your transaction, buyer entity type, and timeline. We review every submission and respond within one business day.

Your information is kept strictly confidential and will never be shared. Privacy Policy

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a Section 338(h)(10) election?

A Section 338(h)(10) election is a joint tax election under the Internal Revenue Code that allows the parties to a qualified stock purchase to treat the transaction as an asset sale for federal income tax purposes, even though the legal transaction is a stock purchase. The buyer gets the tax benefits of an asset purchase - stepped-up basis in the target's underlying assets, enabling greater depreciation and amortization deductions. The transfer mechanics of a stock purchase are preserved - no need to individually assign contracts, permits, or licenses. Both the buyer and seller must jointly elect this treatment by filing IRS Form 8023 on or before the due date of the buyer's tax return for the year of the transaction.

When is a 338(h)(10) election available?

The 338(h)(10) election is available for: (1) acquisitions of S-corporation stock - the most common use case; (2) acquisitions of stock in a target that is a member of a seller's consolidated group (i.e., a corporate subsidiary being sold by a parent in a consolidated return); and (3) certain foreign acquisitions. It is NOT available for standalone C-corporation stock purchases - in that scenario, the Section 338(g) election (a unilateral buyer election) is available but applies different tax mechanics. For most middle-market acquisitions involving S-corps, the 338(h)(10) election is the most important tax planning tool available.

Who bears the tax cost of the 338(h)(10) election?

The seller bears additional tax cost. In a straight stock sale of an S-corp, the selling shareholders recognize capital gain on the sale of their stock - typically the most tax-efficient outcome for the seller. With a 338(h)(10) election, the sale is treated as if the corporation sold all its assets, which means: (1) gain on each asset class is recognized (some asset classes have less favorable tax treatment than capital gain on stock), (2) depreciation recapture may be triggered (ordinary income), and (3) the gain flows through to the S-corp shareholders who report it on their individual returns. Sellers often demand a 'tax gross-up' payment from the buyer to compensate for the incremental tax cost of the election. The buyer benefits from the stepped-up basis; the additional cost is a negotiated payment that effectively splits the tax benefit.

Why would a seller agree to a 338(h)(10) election?

Sellers agree to 338(h)(10) elections when the buyer's tax benefit is large enough to fund a meaningful gross-up payment that leaves the seller economically whole (or better) versus a pure stock sale with no election. This is the most common use of the election: the buyer's stepped-up basis creates future depreciation and amortization deductions worth, say, $1M in NPV. The buyer and seller split the benefit - buyer pays seller an additional $500K gross-up; buyer captures $500K of tax benefit net. Both parties leave money on the table relative to their optimal unilateral outcome, but both are better off than if the deal had not happened at all. The election is fundamentally a value-creation tool that good M&A counsel uses to close deals that would otherwise fail on structure.

What happens if only one party wants the 338(h)(10) election?

The election requires mutual agreement and joint filing - it cannot be made unilaterally by either party. A buyer who wants the election must negotiate it with the seller, and the parties must agree on any gross-up payment to compensate the seller for incremental tax cost. If the seller refuses, the only unilateral option for the buyer is a Section 338(g) election, which treats the acquisition as if the target sold its assets but does not allow the tax benefits to flow through as cleanly to shareholders. For S-corp acquisitions, Section 338(g) is generally not available or not beneficial - the 338(h)(10) is the specific tool for this structure, and both parties must agree.

Can an individual buyer use a 338(h)(10) election?

No. A Section 338(h)(10) election requires the buyer to be a 'purchasing corporation' making a qualified stock purchase - an individual, a partnership, or an LLC that has not elected to be taxed as a corporation cannot join the election, even when buying 100% of an S-corp's stock. This is a common surprise for buyers using a newly formed acquisition entity to hold the target, since many of those entities are not taxed as corporations. Section 336(e) exists precisely to solve this gap: it lets the S-corp and its shareholders elect deemed asset sale treatment on a qualifying stock disposition without requiring the purchaser to be a corporation or to join the election at all. Confirm the tax classification of your acquisition entity with your tax advisor early, since it determines which election, if either, is available.

Does the seller pay more tax under these elections?

Generally, yes. Both a 338(h)(10) election and a 336(e) election convert what would otherwise be a single layer of capital gain on a stock sale into a deemed sale of the target's underlying assets. That deemed sale can trigger less favorable tax treatment on certain asset classes, most notably ordinary income from depreciation recapture, in addition to the capital gain from the stock disposition. The incremental cost varies significantly based on the target's asset mix and depreciation history, which is why sellers typically negotiate a gross-up payment from the buyer to offset it rather than agreeing to either election as a courtesy. Consult your tax advisor to model the specific impact before agreeing to any deemed asset sale election.

When must the election be filed?

For a 338(h)(10) election, IRS Form 8023 generally must be filed by the 15th day of the ninth month after the month in which the acquisition date falls, a hard deadline that is not tied to the purchasing corporation's extended return due date. Form 8883, which reports the purchase price allocation, is filed with the income tax returns of both parties for the year that includes the acquisition. A 336(e) election works differently: it is made through a written, binding election statement, generally attached to the timely filed return (including extensions) of the S-corp and its shareholders, or the selling group's common parent, for the year of the disposition, rather than a standalone form filed in advance. These deadlines are unforgiving and generally cannot be cured after the fact, so confirm exact filing mechanics and dates with your tax advisor as soon as the election is on the table, ideally at LOI.

Related Resources

Related Practice Areas

Our attorneys handle M&A transactions and securities matters nationwide. Alex Lubyansky leads every engagement personally.

Structuring a Stock Purchase Around a Tax Election?

Alex Lubyansky advises buyers and sellers on tax-efficient deal structures, including Section 338(h)(10) and Section 336(e) elections and gross-up negotiations, whether the buyer is a corporation, an individual, or an SBA-financed acquisition entity. The election decision must be made at LOI - not at closing. Senior counsel on every deal.

Request Engagement Assessment

Or call directly: (248) 266-2790