The tax analysis for selling an S-corporation is fundamentally different from selling a C-corp - and most generic M&A content conflates the two. S-corps are pass-through entities, which means gain from a sale flows directly to shareholders, bypassing the corporate-level tax that C-corps pay. This is an advantage, but it also creates specific complications: the character of the gain (ordinary vs. capital), the built-in gains tax risk for recently converted S-corps, and the 338(h)(10) election opportunity that applies specifically to S-corp stock purchases.
Selling an S-corporation? The structure of the transaction determines your after-tax proceeds. Get M&A counsel before the buyer's LOI defines the terms. Request a consultation →
The Tax Comparison: Asset Sale vs. Stock Sale for S-Corps
| Tax Factor | Asset Sale | Stock Sale |
|---|---|---|
| Where gain is recognized | At S-corp level by asset class; flows through to shareholders | At shareholder level on stock sale |
| Ordinary income risk | Yes - depreciation recapture, inventory, covenants | Generally no - stock gain is capital gain |
| Buyer's basis in assets | Stepped up to purchase price (buyer benefit) | Carries over (no step-up without 338(h)(10)) |
| Contract assignment | Required for each contract | Not required (entity survives) |
| Seller preference | Less preferred (ordinary income risk) | Preferred (cleaner cap gains treatment) |
| 338(h)(10) election available? | N/A (already an asset sale) | Yes - converts to asset sale for tax with gross-up |
S-corp buyers will almost always push for an asset sale or 338(h)(10) election. Know the tax impact before you respond to their LOI. Request a consultation →
The 338(h)(10) Path: Closing the Gap
For most S-corp acquisitions, the negotiation path is: buyer wants asset deal (or 338(h)(10) election), seller wants stock sale. The 338(h)(10) election - with a properly structured gross-up payment from buyer to seller - is the most common resolution. The buyer gets stepped-up basis. The transaction closes as a stock purchase (no individual asset assignments). The seller receives a gross-up to compensate for the incremental tax cost of having the transaction treated as an asset sale.
The gross-up math requires modeling each shareholder's incremental tax - the difference between their tax bill with the election versus without it. This is a tax advisor's work, but the M&A attorney must understand it to negotiate the gross-up language in the purchase agreement correctly and to ensure the allocation of the gross-up among multiple shareholders (who may have different bases in their stock) is documented properly.
Multi-shareholder S-corp sale with a 338(h)(10) election? The gross-up allocation among shareholders requires careful structuring. Request a consultation →
Frequently Asked Questions
Why do buyers almost always prefer an asset sale for S-corp acquisitions?
Buyers prefer asset sales because they get a stepped-up tax basis in the acquired assets equal to the purchase price. This allows the buyer to depreciate and amortize the assets from their full current value rather than the seller's often much lower historical cost. For a buyer acquiring an S-corp at $5M with assets worth $5M on the books but originally purchased for $500K, the asset sale provides $4.5M of additional depreciation and amortization opportunity. This creates significant post-acquisition tax savings. In a stock sale without a 338(h)(10) election, the buyer inherits the seller's old basis and loses those future deductions.
How are S-corp shareholders taxed differently from C-corp shareholders on a sale?
S-corporations are pass-through entities - the corporation itself does not pay federal income tax (with certain exceptions like built-in gains tax). Gains from a sale flow through directly to the shareholders on their individual tax returns. In a stock sale, shareholders typically report capital gain on the sale of their stock. In an asset sale, the corporation first recognizes gain at the asset level (allocating to each asset class), which flows through to the shareholders who report it on their individual returns. The key risk in an S-corp asset sale is that some asset gains (depreciation recapture, for example) are ordinary income rather than capital gains, which increases the seller's effective tax rate. This is why sellers generally prefer stock sales for S-corps when possible.
What is the built-in gains tax and when does it apply?
The built-in gains (BIG) tax applies when an S-corporation was previously a C-corporation and converted to S-corp status. If the S-corp disposes of assets that had unrealized appreciation at the time of conversion, a corporate-level tax (at the highest corporate rate, currently 21%) is imposed on those 'built-in gains.' The BIG tax applies for 5 years after the C-to-S conversion. Sellers of S-corps that were recently converted from C-corps must factor this into their deal economics - the BIG tax effectively creates a double-tax scenario on appreciated assets, reducing the economic benefit of the S-corp structure for the first 5 years post-conversion.
How does the 338(h)(10) election help bridge the S-corp asset-vs-stock disagreement?
The 338(h)(10) election is specifically designed for S-corp acquisitions. It allows a stock purchase to be treated as an asset sale for tax purposes. The buyer gets the stepped-up basis they want. The transaction proceeds mechanically as a stock sale - no individual asset assignments. The seller recognizes gain as if the S-corp sold its assets (rather than stock), which typically results in higher tax than a pure stock sale. The buyer compensates the seller for this incremental tax cost with a 'tax gross-up' payment - essentially sharing the value of the stepped-up basis. For S-corp deals where buyer and seller are far apart on asset vs. stock structure, the 338(h)(10) election with a negotiated gross-up is frequently the path to closing.
Do all S-corp shareholders need to consent to the 338(h)(10) election?
Yes. Because the 338(h)(10) election requires joint filing by the buyer and the S-corporation's shareholders, all shareholders must consent. If any shareholder objects, the election cannot be made. This creates a potential problem in multi-shareholder S-corps where shareholders have different tax profiles and some would be more adversely affected by the election than others. Structuring the gross-up payment to adequately compensate each shareholder for their specific incremental tax burden requires careful tax modeling. A selling shareholder with a very low basis in their stock (high gain) will owe more in tax under the election than a shareholder who paid full price in a recent buy-in. The gross-up must be allocated fairly among shareholders to get universal consent.
Related Resources
338(h)(10) Election: Full Analysis
Complete breakdown of the election mechanics, gross-up structure, and when it creates deal value.
FoundationAsset Purchase vs. Stock Purchase
The foundational deal structure analysis - extended to S-corp specific considerations.
Legal ServicesM&A Attorney Services
S-corp transaction structuring, 338(h)(10) election documentation, and purchase price negotiation for sellers.
RelatedEarnout vs. Seller Note
How deferred consideration interacts with the gross-up mechanics in 338(h)(10) S-corp deals.
Related Practice Areas
Our attorneys handle M&A transactions and securities matters nationwide. Alex Lubyansky leads every engagement personally.