Working Capital Adjustment in M&A:How the True-Up Actually Works

Working capital adjustments are one of the most frequently disputed provisions after closing. The buyer and seller agreed on a price - but not on the same definition of what was being delivered. Here is how to prevent that outcome.

By Alex Lubyansky, Esq.June 202611 min read

Key Takeaways

  • The working capital adjustment ensures the buyer receives a business with the agreed amount of operating liquidity - not a business that has been pre-closing cash-stripped by the seller.
  • The true-up is calculated post-closing (typically within 60-90 days) and can result in a payment from buyer to seller or seller to buyer depending on actual vs. target NWC.
  • The definition of "working capital" in the purchase agreement is heavily negotiated and can swing the adjustment by hundreds of thousands of dollars.
  • The locked box is an alternative that eliminates the true-up entirely by fixing the deal economics to a historical balance sheet date.
  • Disputes go to a neutral accounting firm if the parties cannot agree - not to a court. The accountant's determination is typically binding.

The purchase price in an M&A transaction is often described as if it is a fixed number. In most deals, it is not. The headline price assumes the business will be delivered with a certain amount of working capital - receivables, inventory, and payables at normal operating levels. If the seller delivers more or less than that, the price adjusts.

Working capital adjustments account for more post-closing disputes than almost any other provision in the purchase agreement. The root cause is almost always the same: the parties agreed on a target but defined "working capital" differently, or failed to specify the accounting methodology precisely enough to produce a single answer. The result is a post-closing fight over tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars - often a relationship-damaging start to what was supposed to be a productive post-acquisition partnership.

Reviewing a purchase agreement with a working capital provision? The definition of NWC matters as much as the target amount. Request a consultation →

The Mechanics: How the Adjustment Works

1

LOI: Agree on target NWC

The parties agree on a working capital target (typically trailing 12-month average NWC) and the methodology for calculating it. This is the single most important step - getting the definition right here prevents disputes later.

2

Closing: Estimated closing statement

Seller or buyer (per purchase agreement) prepares an estimated closing statement calculating NWC. Closing proceeds are adjusted up or down based on estimated NWC vs. target.

3

Post-closing (60-90 days): Final closing statement

Buyer prepares final closing statement with actual NWC at closing. Seller has 30-45 days to review and object to any items.

4

Dispute resolution: Neutral accountant

If parties disagree, disputed amounts go to a neutral accounting firm (often agreed in the purchase agreement in advance). The accountant resolves only the disputed items; their determination is final and binding.

5

Payment: True-up adjustment

Buyer pays seller (if closing NWC exceeded target) or seller pays buyer (if closing NWC was below target). Adjustment is typically settled in cash within 5-10 business days of final determination.

Working capital target disputes are more preventable than most parties realize. Get the definition right in the purchase agreement. Request a consultation →

Working Capital Adjustment vs. Locked Box: When to Use Each

Working capital adjustment

More common in US transactions. Precise - the buyer pays for exactly what was delivered. But creates post-closing complexity and dispute risk if the NWC definition is not airtight.

Best for: deals where precise pricing matters more than simplicity; where pre-closing operating patterns are volatile.

Locked box

More common in European and PE-to-PE deals. Clean and final - no post-closing calculation. But requires accurate locked box accounts and protection against leakage.

Best for: clean PE exits; transactions with reliable historical financials; parties who prioritize deal certainty.

Negotiating WC target or locked box structure? These provisions significantly affect net closing proceeds. Request a consultation →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a working capital adjustment in an M&A transaction?

A working capital adjustment (also called a working capital true-up or net working capital adjustment) is a post-closing mechanism that adjusts the purchase price based on the actual net working capital delivered at closing compared to a target amount negotiated in the purchase agreement. Net working capital is generally defined as current assets (accounts receivable, inventory, prepaid expenses) minus current liabilities (accounts payable, accrued expenses, deferred revenue). If the seller delivers more working capital than the target, the buyer pays more; if less, the buyer pays less. The adjustment ensures the buyer receives a business with the expected operating liquidity, not a business that has been stripped of cash or working capital by the seller.

What is the locked box alternative to working capital adjustment?

A locked box is a European-origin alternative that fixes the economic effective date of the deal to a historical balance sheet (the 'locked box date') rather than closing. From the locked box date to closing, the seller cannot extract value from the business beyond ordinary-course management fees and dividends agreed in advance. The buyer takes the business as it was on the locked box date, with no post-closing true-up. Locked box structures are simpler - there is no post-closing calculation dispute - but they require the buyer to accept balance sheet risk from the locked box date to closing, and they require confidence in the locked box balance sheet's accuracy. They are common in European transactions and in deals where the parties want certainty and simplicity over precision.

How is the working capital target set?

The working capital target is typically set as the average net working capital of the business over a trailing period (often 12 months), intended to represent 'normal' operating levels. Both parties negotiate this target during the LOI or purchase agreement phase. Setting the target too high is in the buyer's interest (seller must deliver more); too low favors the seller. The definition of what is included in working capital - which assets and liabilities, how cash is treated, whether deferred revenue is included - is heavily negotiated and can have a significant impact on the adjustment. Sellers should engage their accountant and M&A counsel to model the impact of the proposed definition before agreeing to it.

How is the working capital adjustment calculated post-closing?

After closing (typically within 60-90 days), the buyer prepares a closing statement calculating actual net working capital at closing using the accounting methods specified in the purchase agreement. The seller has a review period (typically 30-45 days) to object to the calculation. If the parties cannot agree, the disputed amount goes to a neutral accounting firm for resolution. The accountant's determination is typically final and binding. The adjustment is then paid: if closing NWC exceeded the target, the buyer pays the seller the difference; if below, the seller pays the buyer. Understanding this process before signing the purchase agreement is essential - it is one of the most common sources of post-closing disputes.

What is 'leakage' in the context of a locked box deal?

In a locked box structure, 'leakage' refers to value extracted from the business by the seller between the locked box date and closing that was not permitted under the locked box agreement. Permitted leakage typically includes agreed dividends and management fees. Unpermitted leakage includes transfers to related parties, unusual expenses, or asset disposals not at arm's length. The buyer has the right to recover unpermitted leakage from the seller post-closing, making the locked box concept cleaner in theory but still subject to verification in practice.

Related Resources

Related Practice Areas

Our attorneys handle M&A transactions and securities matters nationwide. Alex Lubyansky leads every engagement personally.

Working Capital Dispute or Locked Box Decision?

Alex Lubyansky advises on purchase price mechanisms including working capital targets, locked box structures, and post-closing true-up disputes. Senior counsel on every deal.

Request Engagement Assessment

Or call directly: (248) 266-2790